ESDiT Publications

@article{nokey,

title = {Rethinking normative status necessary for self-determination in the era of sentient artificial agents},

author = {Arthur Gwagwa},

editor = {E. R. Goffi and A. Momcilovic},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-18},

urldate = {2022-10-18},

journal = {Can an AI be sentient? Multiple perspectives on sentience and on the potential ethical implications of the rise of sentient AI},

number = {30-35},

keywords = {Normative status, Self-determination},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Feeling and thinking on social media: emotions, affective scaffolding, and critical thinking},

author = {Steffen Steinert and Lavinia Marin and Sabine Roeser},

doi = {10.1080/0020174X.2022.2126148},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-14},

urldate = {2022-10-14},

journal = {Inquiry},

pages = {1-22},

keywords = {Affective niche, Affective scaffolding, Critical thinking, Emotions, Social media, Technical mediation},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Responsible innovation in the age of science conspiracism},

author = {Eugen Octav Popa and Vincent Blok},

doi = {10.1080/23299460.2022.2116804},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-12},

urldate = {2022-10-12},

journal = {Journal of Responsible Innovation},

volume = {9},

issue = {3},

pages = {398-418},

keywords = {Conspiracists, Responsible Innovation, Stakeholder inclusion, Thought experiments},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research},

author = {Ilse Marschalek and Vincent Blok and Michael J. Bernstein and Robert Braun and Joshua Cohen and Margit Hofer and Lisa M. Seebacher and Elisabeth Unterfrauner and Stephanie Daimer and Mika Nieminen and Malene Vinther Christensen and Raj Kumar Thapa},

doi = {10.1080/23299460.2022.2119003},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-12},

urldate = {2022-10-12},

journal = {Journal of Responsible Innovation},

volume = {9},

issue = {3},

pages = {419-442},

keywords = {Participatory research, Public engagement, RRI, Social labs},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Dominating Risk Impositions},

author = {Kritika Maheshwari and Sven Nyholm},

doi = {10.1007/s10892-022-09407-4},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-11},

urldate = {2022-10-11},

journal = {The Journal of Ethics},

volume = {26},

pages = {613-637},

keywords = {Ethics, Risks},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Linguistic Interventions and the Ethics of Conceptual Disruption},

author = {Guido Löhr},

doi = {10.1007/s10677-022-10321-9},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-24},

urldate = {2022-09-24},

journal = {Ethical Theory and Moral Practice},

volume = {25},

pages = {835-849},

keywords = {Communicative disruption, Concept creeps, Concepts, Conceptual engineering, Conceptual ethics, Linguistic intervention, Meaning},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Zijn we als maatschappij klaar voor de aankomende ‘technologische storm’?},

author = {Ibo van de Poel and Vivian Lammers},

url = { https://scientias.nl/zijn-we-als-maatschappij-klaar-voor-de-aankomende-technologische-storm/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-16},

urldate = {2022-09-16},

journal = {Scientias},

keywords = {Technological storm},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Community Heroes and Sleeping Members: Interdependency of the Tenets of Energy Justice},

author = {Mandi Astola and Erik Laes and Gunter Bombaerts and Bozena Royszawska and Magdalena Rozwadowska and Piotr Szymanski and Anja Ruess and Sophie Nyborg and Meike Hansen},

doi = {10.1007/s11948-022-00384-3},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-14},

urldate = {2022-09-14},

journal = {Science and Engineering Ethics},

volume = {28},

number = {45},

issue = {5},

keywords = {Energy cooperatives, Energy justice, Justice issues, Renewable energy},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {The current understanding of precision medicine and personalised medicine in selected research disciplines: study protocol of a systematic concept analysis},

author = {Nicola Brew-Sam and Anne Parkinson and Christian Lueck and Ellen Brown and Karen Brown and Anne Bruestle and Katrina Chisholm and Simone Collins and Matthew Cook and Eleni Daskalaki and Janet Drew and Harry Ebbeck and Mark Elisha and Vanessa Fanning and Adam Henschke and Jessica Herron and Emma Matthews and Krishnan Murugappan and Dragomir Neshev and Christopher Nolan and Lachlan Pedley and Christine Phillips and Hanna Suominen and Antonio Tricoli and Kristine Wright and Jane Desborough },

url = {https://www.esdit.nl/e060326-full/},

doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060326},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-07},

urldate = {2022-09-07},

journal = {BMJ Journals},

volume = {12},

issue = {9},

abstract = {Introduction

The terms ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ have become key terms in health-related research and in science-related public communication. However, the application of these two concepts and their interpretation in various disciplines are heterogeneous, which also affects research translation and public awareness. This leads to confusion regarding the use and distinction of the two concepts. Our aim is to provide a snapshot of the current understanding of these concepts.



Methods and analysis

Our study will use Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis to systematically examine the current understanding of the concepts ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ in clinical medicine, biomedicine (incorporating genomics and bioinformatics), health services research, physics, chemistry, engineering, machine learning and artificial intelligence, and to identify their respective attributes (clusters of characteristics) and surrogate and related terms. A systematic search of the literature will be conducted for 2016–2022 using databases relevant to each of these disciplines: ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, F1000Research, IEEE Xplore, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. These are among the most representative databases for the included disciplines. We will examine similarities and differences in definitions of ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ in the respective disciplines and across (sub)disciplines, including attributes of each term. This will enable us to determine how these two concepts are distinguished.



Ethics and dissemination

Following ethical and research standards, we will comprehensively report the methodology for a systematic analysis following Rodgers’ concept analysis method. Our systematic concept analysis will contribute to the clarification of the two concepts and distinction in their application in given settings and circumstances. Such a broad concept analysis will contribute to non-systematic syntheses of the concepts, or occasional systematic reviews on one of the concepts that have been published in specific disciplines, in order to facilitate interdisciplinary communication, translational medical research and implementation science.},

keywords = {QUALITATIVE RESEARCH},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Wastewater research and surveillance: an ethical exploration},

author = {Neelke Doorn},

doi = {10.1039/d2ew00127f},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-02},

journal = {Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology},

volume = {8},

pages = {2431-2438},

keywords = {Surveillance, Wastewater},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {The just transition fund – Did the European Union learn from Europe's past transition experiences?},

author = {Karen Moesker and Udo Pesch},

doi = {10.1016/j.erss.2022.102750},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-01},

journal = {Energy Research & Social Science},

volume = {91},

number = {102759},

keywords = {Energy transition, European Union, Just transition fund, Transition justice},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change},

author = {Ibo van de Poel},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-30},

journal = {Philosophy and Technology},

volume = {35},

number = {82},

keywords = {Contextual integrity, Disruptive technology, Ethics, Techno-moral change, Technological change, Value change},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Blending in, to Transform the Regime from within: Niche Hybridisation Strategies of Irish Energy Communities},

author = {Luc F. M. van Summeren and Anna J. Wieczorek and Geert Verbong and Gunter Bombaerts},

doi = {10.2139/ssrn.4203646},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-29},

keywords = {Energy community, Niche hybridisation},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {‘De mens wordt steeds meer een robot’},

author = {Lambèr Royakkers and Nathalie Huigsloot},

url = {https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2022-08-28/de-mens-wordt-steeds-meer-een-robot/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-28},

journal = {HP De Tijd},

keywords = {Artificial intelligence},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Perspectives on the Acceptance and Social Implications of Smart Glasses: A Qualitative Focus Group Study in Healthcare},

author = {Niek Zuidhof and Somaya Ben Allouch and Oscar Peters and Peter-Paul Verbeek},

doi = {10.1080/10447318.2022.2111046},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-26},

journal = {International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction},

keywords = {Healthcare, Smart glasses, Social implications},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto: Gendering robots is a cognitive shortcut that can lead to short circuits},

author = {Giulia Perugia and Petra Stock},

url = {https://cosmosmagazine.com/technology/gendering-robots-cognitive-shortcut-to-short-circuits/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-26},

journal = {Cosmos},

keywords = {Gendering robots},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Towards the Phenomenology of Hybrids as Regenerative Design and Use – A Post-Heideggerian Account},

author = {Magdalena Holy-Luczaj and Vincent Blok},

doi = {10.3197/096327122X16611552268627},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-22},

journal = {Environmental Values},

volume = {30},

issue = {1},

keywords = {Hybrids, Phenomenology, Post-Heideggerian account, Regenerative design},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Contestable AI by Design: Towards a Framework},

author = {Kars Alfrink and Ianus Keller and Gerd Kortuem and Neelke Doorn},

doi = {10.1007/s11023-022-09611-z},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-13},

journal = {Minds and Machines},

keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Automated decision-making, Contestability, Design, Human-computer interaction, Machine learning, Sociotechnical systems},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change},

author = {Elizabeth O'Neill},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00574-8},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-12},

journal = {Philosophy and Technology},

volume = {35},

number = {79},

keywords = {Contextual integrity, Disruptive technology, Ethics, Norms, Privacy, Values},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Multilateral Governance of Technological Risks; Editors’ Overview},

author = {Behnam Taebi and Marjolein van Asselt and Ibo van de Poel},

doi = {10.1080/13669877.2022.2104345},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-08},

journal = {Journal of Risk Research},

volume = {25},

issue = {8},

pages = {941-944},

keywords = {Multilateral governance, Technological risks},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {How to Do Things with Information Online. A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Social Networking Platforms as Epistemic Environments},

author = {Lavinia Marin},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00569-5},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-05},

journal = {Philosophy and Technology},

volume = {35},

number = {77},

keywords = {Epistemic agency, Epistemic environment, Epistemic sensitivity, Situated cognition, Skilled action, Social networking platforms},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Rutjes2022,

title = {Running Coaches’ Interactions with a Marathon Prediction Tool},

author = {Heleen Rutjes and Martijn C Willemsen and Barry Smyth and Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-01},

journal = {IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems},

keywords = {Prediction, Technology interaction},

pubstate = {forthcoming},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Art for Public Engagement on Emerging and Controversial Technologies: A Literature Review},

author = {Aafke Fraaije and Marjoleine G. van der Meij and Frank Kupper and Jacqueline E. W. Broerse},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221093213},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-01},

urldate = {2022-08-01},

journal = {Public Understanding of Science },

volume = {31},

number = {6},

pages = {694–710},

keywords = {Controversial Technologies, Emerging technologies, Public engagement},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Addressing Online Gaming Toxicity  from a Confucian Perspective},

author = {Joseph Sta. Maria and Elena Ziliotti},

url = {https://www.esdit.nl/adressing-online-gaming-toxicity-from-a-confucian-perspective/},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2022..38.131},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-01},

urldate = {2022-08-01},

journal = {Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture},

volume = {38},

pages = {131-152},

abstract = {Can Confucian ethics contribute to diagnosing the root causes of video games’ toxicity and formulating design requirements for redressing it? Contemporary Confucian studies on technology have not addressed these questions, although video games have become an important part of contemporary human life. 

This paper advances Confucian-inspired ethical studies on technologies by bringing attention to the moral dimension of this underexamined aspect of contemporary life. By focusing on League of Legends (one of the most popular toxic online multiplayer games), we argue that League’s toxic environment hinders the cultivation of ren (仁), shu (恕), and he (和), but Confucian conceptual resources can inspire the formulation of at least three design recommendations against League’s toxicity. The first is to eliminate killing in the game by banking on players’ desire to express their skillfulness. The second is to include a rewatching feature to sanction toxic players with the aim of inculcating sympathy in them. The last is to add a procedure before and after each match, where players can cordially interact with each other and develop mutual respect.

},

keywords = {Confucianism, Ethics of Technology, League of Legend, toxicity},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Robot Theology: Old Questions through New Media},

author = {Cindy Friedman},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v31i1.100},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-31},

journal = {Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies},

volume = {32},

number = {1},

issue = {1},

keywords = {Robots, Theology},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Intercultural Ethics for Digital Well-Being: Identifying Problems and Exploring Solutions},

author = {Matthew Dennis and Rockwell F. Clancy},

doi = {10.1007/s44206-022-00006-2},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-30},

journal = {Digital Society},

volume = {1},

number = {7},

keywords = {Digital technologies, Digital well-being, Intercultural ethics, Social media},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Technology as Driver for Morally Motivated Conceptual Engineering},

author = {Herman Veluwenkamp and Marianna Capasso and Jonne Maas and Lavinia Marin},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00565-9},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-28},

journal = {Philosophy and Technology},

volume = {35},

number = {71},

keywords = {Conceptual engineering, Control, Critical thinking, Freedom, Moral conflict, Technology},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Reflecting on Design Methods and Democratic Technology Development: The Case of Dutch Covid-19 Digital Contact-Tracing Application},

author = {Deger Ozkaramanli and Armagan Karahanoglu and Peter-Paul Verbeek},

doi = {10.1016/j.sheji.2022.04.002},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-20},

journal = {She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation},

volume = {8},

issue = {2},

pages = {244-269},

keywords = {Adversarial design, COVID-19, Democracy, Design methods, Participatory design, Speculative critical design},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Moreel dilemma: mag je schaarse mineralen winnen voor de goede zaak?},

author = {Jeroen Hopster},

url = {https://www.filosofie.nl/mag-je-schaarse-mineralen-winnen-voor-de-goede-zaak/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-15},

journal = {Filosofie Magazine},

volume = {07/08-2022},

keywords = {Moral dilemmas, Natural resources},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {On the sui generis value capture of new digital technologies: The case of AI},

author = {Emre Kazim and Enzo Fenoglio and Airlie Hilliard and Adriano Koshiyama and Catherine Mulligan and Markus Trengove and Abigail Gilbert and Arthur Gwagwa and Denise Almeida and Phil Gosdiff and Kaska Porayska-Pomsta},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100526},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-08},

journal = {Patterns},

volume = {3},

number = {100526},

issue = {7},

keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Digital assets, Information theory, Ontology, Value theory},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Pistols, pills, pork and ploughs: the structure of technomoral revolutions},

author = {Jeroen Hopster and Chirag Arora and Charlie Blunden and Cecilie Eriksen and Lily Frank and Julia Hermann and Michael Klenk and Elizabeth O'Neill and Steffen Steinert},

doi = {10.1080/0020174X.2022.2090434},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-08},

journal = {Inquiry},

pages = {1-33},

keywords = {Moral change, Moral niche construction, Moral revolution, Payoff mechanisms, Techno-moral change},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Recent Experimental Philosophy on Joint Action: Do We Need a New Normativism About Collective Action? },

author = {Guido Löhr},

doi = {10.1093/pq/pqab070},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-02},

journal = {The Philosophical Quarterly},

volume = {72},

issue = {3},

pages = {754-762},

keywords = {Collective action, Collective intention, Directed duties, Interpersonal obligation, Joint commitment, Shared agency},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}