@article{nokey,
title = {Balancing Caution and the Need for Change: The General Contextual Integrity Approach },
author = {Elizabeth O'Neill},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/balancing-caution-and-the-need-for-change/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00671-2},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-10-16},
urldate = {2023-10-16},
journal = { Philosophy & Technology},
volume = {36},
number = {4},
abstract = {In this reply to van de Poel’s (Philosophy & Technology, 35(3), 82, 2022) commentary on O’Neill (Philosophy & Technology, 35(79), 2022), I discuss two worries about the general contextual integrity approach to evaluating technological change. First, I address van de Poel’s concern that the general contextual integrity approach will not supply the right guidance in cases where morally problematic technological change poses no threat to contextual integrity. Second, I elaborate on how the approach supplies mechanisms for balancing caution with the need for change.},
keywords = {Contextual integrity, Ethics of Technology, Norm change, Socially disruptive technologies, Technological change, Value change},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
