We currently have two vacancies for PhD candidates! Check it out 🙂

About the ESDiT programme

The overall aim of the research programme is to develop a comprehensive philosophical understanding of the socially disruptive technologies (SDTs) of the 21st century, and in particular their challenge to the very concepts and values that we normally appeal to in our moral thinking. These concepts and values form the basis of our current moral, political, and anthropological order. There is an urgency to this aim, as we need to develop new moral frameworks to guide these technologies for the betterment of humanity.

The need for a reflective turn

We are now at the beginning of a new era of technological innovation; New generations of the technologies that have emerged since the second world war are converging and undergoing widespread integration. This makes whole new fields possible, including artificial intelligence, robotics, synthetic biology, nanomedicine, next-generation genomics, neurotechnology and geo-engineering. These are socially disruptive technologies (SDTs) that have the potential to radically alter everyday life, cultural practices and social and economic institutions.

Societal disruption may well be necessary and desirable for responding to pressing global problems such as climate change and depletion of natural resources. But the technologies also raise tough moral questions that are in need of ethical evaluation. A complication is they may affect the basic concepts and values that we normally appeal to in our ethical thinking, such as the distinction between nature and artifact or our conceptions of freedom and responsibility. A reflective turn in the ethics of technology is therefore necessary.

A study of key ethical and philosophical concepts

The ESDIT research program in ethics and practical philosophy of technology seeks to realize a reflective turn. Our aim is to reorient the field of ethics of technology by taking up the challenge that socially disruptive technologies pose to our core concepts. In particular, to

  • the concepts that underlie our moral self-understanding, such as (moral) agency, autonomy, human interdependence, and responsibility;
  • the concepts that form the basis of our political, social and legal institutions, such as democracy, justice, and equality;
  • the basic ontological categories that we use to order our world, such as the distinctions between natural and artificial, humans and machines, public and private, and agents and physical systems.

Developing new concepts, theories and methods

In this research programme, we aim to develop 21th–century ontological and moral concepts for a 21th–century world. The conceptual reevaluations and innovations that this research brings forth will be used not only to innovate ethics of technology, but also the field of ethics and practical philosophy as a whole, as well as the social sciences. In parallel we aim to develop new theories and methods that are necessary to understand, morally assess and intervene in the development and implementation of this new generation of socially disruptive technologies.

New digital technologies

including robotics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, Internet of Things (IoT), big data, blockchain, social media, and quantum computing.

New bio- and brain technologies

including gene editing, gene drives, synthetic biology, neurotechnology, advanced medical and food technologies, and technologies for human enhancement.

New environmental & sustainable technologies

including energy technologies, water technologies, recycling and other technologies for the circular economy, climate engineering, and bio-based and low-carbon technologies.

Our Specific aims


New comprehensive approaches

We aim to develop new comprehensive approaches in ethics and philosophy for analyze, morally evaluating and intervening in the development and implementation of socially disruptive technologies, specifically the newest generation.


Innovating ethics & philosophy

We aim to engage in systematic, reflective studies of key philosophical and ethical concepts that are challenged by SDTs, thereby innovating the ethics and philosophy of technology and the field of (practical) philosophy as a whole


Connecting ethics to engineering

We aim to innovate the ethics and philosophy of technology by repositioning its relation to the engineering sciences by developing collaborative models between philosophers and engineers aimed at improved philosophical and ethical analysis and responsible innovation.


Study disruptive technologies

We aim to develop innovative, longitudinal and encompassing philosophical and ethical studies of the new generation of SDT’s and their impacts on humans, nature and society, including studies of new digital technologies, new bio and brain technologies, and new environmental and sustainable technologies for a circular economy.

ESDiT Research Lines

Research in the Esdit programme is structured along four research lines. The goal is to develop an integrated assessment of SDTs and the moral frameworks needed to guide their development.

Nature, Life & Human Intervention

Nature, Life & Human Intervention

We aim to go beyond traditional discussions about the normative status of nature, e.g., whether there is something intrinsically good or desirable in nature and something objectionable in changing nature.
The Human Condition

The Human Condition

We investigate how and to what extent socially disruptive technologies have implications with regard to humans, humanity and the human condition, focusing on new biomedical and digital technologies.
The Future of a Fair & Free Society

The Future of a Fair & Free Society

We try to map how the changes in social relations, social structures, social institutions, and democratic practices, brought about by SDTs affect the basic concepts of social and political philosophy.
Foundations & Synthesis

Foundations & Synthesis

This research line aims to develop more synthesizing perspectives on the entire topic of the research programme. We work on frameworks that are able to provide normative responses to the challenge of SDTs.