@article{nokey,
title = {What does it mean that all is aflame? Non-axial Buddhist inspiration for an Anthropocene ontology},
author = {Tom Hannes and Gunter Bombaerts},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/what-does-it-mean-that-all-is-aflame/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/205301962311539},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-01},
urldate = {2023-12-01},
journal = {The Anthropocene Review},
volume = {10},
issue = {3},
pages = {771-786},
abstract = {Bruno Latour’s “practical climatoscepticism” expresses our moral inhibition with respect to the climate crisis. In spite of Clive Hamilton’s claim that the Anthropocene condition requires us to be suspicious of all previous (i.e. Holocene) ontologies, we propose a threefold Anthropocene ontological structure inspired by non-axial Buddhist elements. In the ontological field, the overall domain in which meaning is searched for, the Buddhist relationalist view on existence can nurture post-humanist philosophies. For the ontological home, one’s specific position and responsibilities, the Buddhist concept “dharma-position” can feed into Hamilton’s “new anthropocentrism.” For the ontological path, the ideal qualities of our interactions, the Buddhist “brahmaviharas” can lend functional structure to the tensions between philosophies of radical acceptance and engaged action. We discuss how this threefold ontological structure provides partial answers to Latour’s “practical climatoscepticism” and Hamilton’s no-analogue world. We sketch avenues for investigation for various Anthropocene ontologies.},
keywords = {Anthropocene, axial age, Buddhism, Charles Taylor, Clive Hamilton, eco-modernism, Ontology, post-humanism, Zen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
