@article{nokey,
title = {“It takes a village to write a really good paper”: A normative framework for peer reviewing in philosophy},
author = {Samantha Copeland and Lavinia Marin},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/metaphilosophy-2024-copeland-it-takes-a-village-to-write-a-really-good-paper-a-normative-framework-for-peer/},
doi = {10.1111/meta.12670},
issn = {0026-1068},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-03-18},
urldate = {2024-03-18},
journal = {Metaphilosophy},
volume = {n/a},
issue = {n/a},
abstract = {That there is a "crisis of peer review" at the moment is not in dispute, but sufficient attention has not yet been paid to the normative potential that lies in current calls for reform. In contrast to approaches to "fixing" the problems in peer review, which tend to maintain the status quo in terms of professionalising opportunities, this paper addresses the needs of philosophers and how peer-review reform can be an opportunity to improve the academic discipline of philosophy, whereby progress is understood as making the discipline more fair to the global academic community and more conducive to the flourishing of academic philosophers. The paper evaluates recent categories of relevant norms and correlating reforms. In conclusion, it recommends that philosophy pursue the norms of transparency and democracy explicitly when proposing peer-review reform and suggest that proposals for forum-based models of peer review are most likely to support those norms.},
keywords = {Academic Philosophy, Fairness, Flourishing, Normativity, Peer Review},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
