2023
Remmers, Gaston; Hermann, Julia; Siebrand, Egbert; van Leersum, Catharina M.
Mind the Relationship: A Multi-Layered Ethical Framework for Citizen Science in Health Journal Article
In: Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics , vol. XXV, iss. 2, pp. 171-196, 2023.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Capabilities approach, care ethics, citizen science, health, Justice, participation
@article{nokey,
title = {Mind the Relationship: A Multi-Layered Ethical Framework for Citizen Science in Health},
author = {Gaston Remmers and Julia Hermann and Egbert Siebrand and Catharina M. van Leersum},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-31},
urldate = {2023-01-31},
journal = {Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics },
volume = {XXV},
issue = {2},
pages = {171-196},
abstract = {There is a heated debate about what citizen science is and is not. We argue that instead of aiming
at a definition of citizen science, we should reflect upon its ethical starting points. Based on our
practical experiences with citizen science initiatives, we come up with an ethical framework that
consists of two core values (respect and justice), five ethical desiderata (relationship between
equals; recognition of each other's capacities, knowledge, and agency; reciprocity; openness for
different goals; and openness for different research methods and paradigms) and two
fundamental qualities (symmetry and transparency). The desiderata reflect ethically problematic
practices, such as the use of citizens by academic scientists as mere sensors, and biases in the
existing literature, such as labelling the projects that are initiated and led by citizens as “extreme”.
The desiderata are supported by two ethical theories: care ethics and the capabilities approach.
The aim of our ethical framework is to stimulate and facilitate reflection upon what needs to be
considered when co-creating or assessing a citizen science initiative. Fundamentally, citizen
science ought to be a humanizing endeavour unlocking the investigative capacities of humans.
The ethical framework is meant to help reflect on this endeavour.
},
keywords = {Capabilities approach, care ethics, citizen science, health, Justice, participation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
There is a heated debate about what citizen science is and is not. We argue that instead of aiming
at a definition of citizen science, we should reflect upon its ethical starting points. Based on our
practical experiences with citizen science initiatives, we come up with an ethical framework that
consists of two core values (respect and justice), five ethical desiderata (relationship between
equals; recognition of each other's capacities, knowledge, and agency; reciprocity; openness for
different goals; and openness for different research methods and paradigms) and two
fundamental qualities (symmetry and transparency). The desiderata reflect ethically problematic
practices, such as the use of citizens by academic scientists as mere sensors, and biases in the
existing literature, such as labelling the projects that are initiated and led by citizens as “extreme”.
The desiderata are supported by two ethical theories: care ethics and the capabilities approach.
The aim of our ethical framework is to stimulate and facilitate reflection upon what needs to be
considered when co-creating or assessing a citizen science initiative. Fundamentally, citizen
science ought to be a humanizing endeavour unlocking the investigative capacities of humans.
The ethical framework is meant to help reflect on this endeavour.
at a definition of citizen science, we should reflect upon its ethical starting points. Based on our
practical experiences with citizen science initiatives, we come up with an ethical framework that
consists of two core values (respect and justice), five ethical desiderata (relationship between
equals; recognition of each other's capacities, knowledge, and agency; reciprocity; openness for
different goals; and openness for different research methods and paradigms) and two
fundamental qualities (symmetry and transparency). The desiderata reflect ethically problematic
practices, such as the use of citizens by academic scientists as mere sensors, and biases in the
existing literature, such as labelling the projects that are initiated and led by citizens as “extreme”.
The desiderata are supported by two ethical theories: care ethics and the capabilities approach.
The aim of our ethical framework is to stimulate and facilitate reflection upon what needs to be
considered when co-creating or assessing a citizen science initiative. Fundamentally, citizen
science ought to be a humanizing endeavour unlocking the investigative capacities of humans.
The ethical framework is meant to help reflect on this endeavour.
2016
Kroese, Floor M.; Nauts, Sanne; Kamphorst, Bart A.; Anderson, Joel; Ridder, Denise T. D.
Bedtime Procrastination: A Behavioral Perspective on Sleep Insufficiency Book Section
In: Sirois, Fuschia M.; Pychyl, Timothy A. (Ed.): Procrastination, Health, and Well-Being, pp. 93-119, Academic Press, San Diego, 2016, ISBN: 978-0-12-802862-9.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: health, interventions, procrastination, self-regulation, sleep
@incollection{KROESE201693,
title = {Bedtime Procrastination: A Behavioral Perspective on Sleep Insufficiency},
author = {Floor M. Kroese and Sanne Nauts and Bart A. Kamphorst and Joel Anderson and Denise T. D. Ridder},
editor = {Fuschia M. Sirois and Timothy A. Pychyl},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128028629000050},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802862-9.00005-0},
isbn = {978-0-12-802862-9},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2016-01-01},
booktitle = {Procrastination, Health, and Well-Being},
pages = {93-119},
publisher = {Academic Press},
address = {San Diego},
abstract = {In this chapter, we discuss a specific domain of procrastination that significantly affects health and well-being, “bedtime procrastination”: the phenomenon of postponing going to bed, typically resulting in a lack of sleep. This chapter describes how a lack of sleep affects health and well-being, how bedtime procrastination plays a role in this regard, and why people do it. Essentially, we argue that going to bed late can be conceived of as a self-regulation problem, just like procrastination in other domains. Building on this conceptualization, we suggest interventions that may help people hit the pillow on time, and discuss avenues for future research. We conclude that considering sleep insufficiency from a self-regulation perspective may be an important step to further understanding and finding ways to reduce this self-undermining behavior.},
keywords = {health, interventions, procrastination, self-regulation, sleep},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}
In this chapter, we discuss a specific domain of procrastination that significantly affects health and well-being, “bedtime procrastination”: the phenomenon of postponing going to bed, typically resulting in a lack of sleep. This chapter describes how a lack of sleep affects health and well-being, how bedtime procrastination plays a role in this regard, and why people do it. Essentially, we argue that going to bed late can be conceived of as a self-regulation problem, just like procrastination in other domains. Building on this conceptualization, we suggest interventions that may help people hit the pillow on time, and discuss avenues for future research. We conclude that considering sleep insufficiency from a self-regulation perspective may be an important step to further understanding and finding ways to reduce this self-undermining behavior.