2023
Puzio, Anna
Robot, let us pray! Can and should robots have religious functions? An ethical exploration of religious robots Journal Article
In: AI & Society, 2023, ISBN: 1435-5655.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Ethics, Existential, Relegious robots, Religion, Social robots, Spirituality
@article{Puzio2023,
title = {Robot, let us pray! Can and should robots have religious functions? An ethical exploration of religious robots},
author = {Anna Puzio},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/robot-let-us-pray/},
doi = {10.1007/s00146-023-01812-z},
isbn = {1435-5655},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-11},
urldate = {2023-12-11},
journal = {AI & Society},
abstract = {Considerable progress is being made in robotics, with robots being developed for many different areas of life: there are service robots, industrial robots, transport robots, medical robots, household robots, sex robots, exploration robots, military robots, and many more. As robot development advances, an intriguing question arises: should robots also encompass religious functions? Religious robots could be used in religious practices, education, discussions, and ceremonies within religious buildings. This article delves into two pivotal questions, combining perspectives from philosophy and religious studies: can and should robots have religious functions? Section 2 initiates the discourse by introducing and discussing the relationship between robots and religion. The core of the article (developed in Sects. 3 and 4) scrutinizes the fundamental questions: can robots possess religious functions, and should they? After an exhaustive discussion of the arguments, benefits, and potential objections regarding religious robots, Sect. 5 addresses the lingering ethical challenges that demand attention. Section 6 presents a discussion of the findings, outlines the limitations of this study, and ultimately responds to the dual research question. Based on the study’s results, brief criteria for the development and deployment of religious robots are proposed, serving as guidelines for future research. Section 7 concludes by offering insights into the future development of religious robots and potential avenues for further research.},
keywords = {Ethics, Existential, Relegious robots, Religion, Social robots, Spirituality},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Considerable progress is being made in robotics, with robots being developed for many different areas of life: there are service robots, industrial robots, transport robots, medical robots, household robots, sex robots, exploration robots, military robots, and many more. As robot development advances, an intriguing question arises: should robots also encompass religious functions? Religious robots could be used in religious practices, education, discussions, and ceremonies within religious buildings. This article delves into two pivotal questions, combining perspectives from philosophy and religious studies: can and should robots have religious functions? Section 2 initiates the discourse by introducing and discussing the relationship between robots and religion. The core of the article (developed in Sects. 3 and 4) scrutinizes the fundamental questions: can robots possess religious functions, and should they? After an exhaustive discussion of the arguments, benefits, and potential objections regarding religious robots, Sect. 5 addresses the lingering ethical challenges that demand attention. Section 6 presents a discussion of the findings, outlines the limitations of this study, and ultimately responds to the dual research question. Based on the study’s results, brief criteria for the development and deployment of religious robots are proposed, serving as guidelines for future research. Section 7 concludes by offering insights into the future development of religious robots and potential avenues for further research.
2021
Levine, Sydney; Rottman, Joshua; Davis, Taylor; O'Neill, Elizabeth; Stich, Stephen; Macherylevi, Edouard
Religious Affiliation and Conceptions of the Moral Domain Journal Article
In: Social Cognition, vol. 39, iss. 1, pp. 139-165, 2021.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Moral disagreement, Moral domain, Religion
@article{nokey,
title = {Religious Affiliation and Conceptions of the Moral Domain},
author = {Sydney Levine and Joshua Rottman and Taylor Davis and Elizabeth O'Neill and Stephen Stich and Edouard Macherylevi
},
doi = {10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.139},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-02-01},
journal = {Social Cognition},
volume = {39},
issue = {1},
pages = {139-165},
keywords = {Moral disagreement, Moral domain, Religion},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}