ESDiT Publications

@article{nokey,

title = {Steering Representations—Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins},

author = {Paulan Korenhof and Vincent Blok and Sanneke Kloppenburg},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-021-00484-1},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-12-01},

journal = {Philosophy & Technology},

volume = {34},

issue = {4},

pages = {1751-1773},

keywords = {Critical understanding, Digital twin, Philosophy, Representation, Technical discourse},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society, and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence},

author = {Ibo van de Poel},

doi = {10.1515/humaff-2020-0042},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-09},

urldate = {2020-10-09},

journal = {Human Affairs},

volume = {30},

issue = {4},

pages = {499-511},

keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Co-evolution, Philosophy, Society, Technological determinism, Technology, Values},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Roeser2019,

title = {Geoengineering the climate and ethical challenges: what we can learn from moral emotions and art},

author = {Sabine Roeser and Behnam Taebi and Neelke Doorn},

doi = {10.1080/13698230.2020.1694225},

issn = {1743-8772},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-07-28},

urldate = {2020-07-28},

journal = {Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy},

volume = {23},

pages = {641--658},

publisher = {Informa UK Limited},

abstract = {Climate change is an urgent problem, requiring ways and approaches to address it. Possible solutions are mitigation, adaptation and deployment of geoengineering. In this article we argue that geoengineering gives rise to ethical challenges of its own. Reflecting on these ethical challenges requires approaches that go beyond conventional, quantitative methods of risk assessment. Quantitative methods leave out important ethical considerations such as justice, fairness, autonomy and legitimacy. We argue that emotions and art can play an important role in ethical deliberation about geoengineering. Emotions can point out what morally matters. We also examine the role that works of art can play. Recently, artists have become involved with risky technologies. We argue that such artworks can contribute to emotional-moral reflection and public deliberation on geoengineering, by making abstract problems more concrete, letting us broaden narrow personal perspectives, exploring new scenarios, and challenging our imagination.},

keywords = {Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}